Recently in Skepticism Category

Simon_Singh.jpg

Great news!

The quacks, aka chiropractors, have dropped their lawsuit against Simon Singh!

The British Chiropractic Association has dropped its libel action against the science writer Simon Singh.

[...]

Dr Singh recently won an appeal that would have allowed him to use the fair comment defence in the case.

On Thursday, the website of William McCormick QC, one of the barristers acting for Simon Singh, said the British Chiropractic Association has served a "Notice of Discontinuance". This means the case is now over.

The Big O

| | Comments () | TrackBacks (0) | Digg This | Facebook

Oprah Winfrey is an extremely stupid person.

The top-rated new show on American television this season is a rarity; it's a show that admits that all psychics are frauds, or at best deluded.

Not only does it admit it, it practically shouts it.

What a refreshing show in a medium that normally touts the likes of the evil fraud Sylvia Browne.

simon baker.jpg

The series stars Simon Baker as a former television psychic, whose shenanigans ended up getting his family killed. So now he uses his powers of observation along with lots of old carny tricks to aid law enforcement.

In one sense it's just a standard tv crime drama.

But nearly every episode features some delicious dialog proclaiming the non-existence of real psychics.

In a recent New York Times interview the series creator, Bruno Heller, talks about "The Mentalist":

Take, for instance, the show’s unabashed message that television psychics in the vein of John Edward are shams. “The show is not directed at him particularly,” Mr. Heller said. “You name the TV psychic — they’re con men. I can say that with complete confidence because John Edward is not going to sue anyone for libel on that score. The reason I know that is because the techniques he uses are those carnival psychics and soothsayers have been using for hundreds of years.” (Asked for a response from Mr. Edward, his publicist sent an e-mail message: “No comment.”)

Friedrich Schiller famously wrote: "Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens." ("Against stupidity the gods themselves contend in vain.")

Which pretty much sums up the Transportation Security Administration (TSA).

Happily, I no longer have to fly, so I haven't been affected by the idiots in charge of airport security.

Here is Bruce Schneier explaining how to fly, even if you are on the no-fly list:

How to fly, even if you are on the no-fly list: Buy a ticket in some innocent person's name. At home, before your flight, check in online and print out your boarding pass. Then, save that web page as a PDF and use Adobe Acrobat to change the name on the boarding pass to your own. Print it again. At the airport, use the fake boarding pass and your valid ID to get through security. At the gate, use the real boarding pass in the fake name to board your flight.

The problem is that it is unverified passenger names that get checked against the no-fly list. At security checkpoints, the TSA just matches IDs to whatever is printed on the boarding passes. The airline checks boarding passes against tickets when people board the plane. But because no one checks ticketed names against IDs, the security breaks down.

This vulnerability isn't new. It isn't even subtle. I first wrote about it in 2006. I asked Kip Hawley, who runs the TSA, about it in 2007. Today, any terrorist smart enough to Google "print your own boarding pass" can bypass the no-fly list.

This gaping security hole would bother me more if the very idea of a no-fly list weren't so ineffective. The system is based on the faulty notion that the feds have this master list of terrorists, and all we have to do is keep the people on the list off the planes.

That's just not true. The no-fly list -- a list of people so dangerous they are not allowed to fly yet so innocent we can't arrest them -- and the less dangerous "watch list" contain a combined 1 million names representing the identities and aliases of an estimated 400,000 people. There aren't that many terrorists out there; if there were, we would be feeling their effects.

Almost all of the people stopped by the no-fly list are false positives. It catches innocents such as Ted Kennedy, whose name is similar to someone's on the list, and Islam Yusuf (formerly Cat Stevens), who was on the list but no one knew why.

[...]

But even if these lists were complete and accurate, they wouldn't work. Timothy McVeigh, the Unabomber, the D.C. snipers, the London subway bombers and most of the 9/11 terrorists weren't on any list before they committed their terrorist acts. And if a terrorist wants to know if he's on a list, the TSA has approved a convenient, $100 service that allows him to figure it out: the Clear program, which issues IDs to "trusted travelers" to speed them through security lines. Just apply for a Clear card; if you get one, you're not on the list.

In the end, the photo ID requirement is based on the myth that we can somehow correlate identity with intent. We can't. And instead of wasting money trying, we would be far safer as a nation if we invested in intelligence, investigation and emergency response -- security measures that aren't based on a guess about a terrorist target or tactic.

That's the TSA: Not doing the right things. Not even doing right the things it does.

Mark Crislip says some interesting things about death and dying.

Expelled

| | Comments () | TrackBacks (0) | Digg This | Facebook

Ben Stein

Here's a good web site for excellent information on the congenitally stupid primate named Ben Stein.

Coincidentally, it also has the scoop on the looney creationist propaganda film called Expelled.

Reading List

About this Archive

This page is an archive of recent entries in the Skepticism category.

Science and Technology is the previous category.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Older content can be found at the original Compassionate Curmudgeon site.